Page 3
STAND in Washington 2010
November 2010 Elections should see the largest
Electoral turn-out in US history

[ Your Text Here ]
[ Your Text Here ]
[ Your Text Here ]
But it will not happen unless the nation's attention is riveted on the exposure, a confrontation with,  and replacement of a Congress bringing us to the brink of monetary and national collapse. 

 It could be that the entirety of DC will be shut down for weeks by a mass invasion of fellow citizens in the summer of 2010 who will come and go in waves by the 10's of thousands daily for several weeks. They will arrive from all corners of the nation.

Not everyone who wanted to go to DC on Sept. 12, 2009, did go. When it is stretched out over several weeks, making a trip and taking a stand in DC will be do-able for millions more. The numbers could multiply 10 fold. Plans will be made for a long STAND –a sustained effort to impress upon the current Administration and Congress that they have launched an over-the-top unconstitutional assault on our freedoms that cannot and must not stand. It will not be the "March on Washington" – It will be the Stand in Washington of 2010.   This will trigger an unprecedented civil crisis and  electoral response.

#1 Agenda for the  2011
112th Congress


REPEAL
the 111th  Congress's
Health Care 
Act if passed in March 2010

it all hinges on the November 2010 vote
to Clean-out Congress
March 21, 2010 House vote:
a brief example/comparison  of the wreckoncilation provisions
from ABC news

Do we really want  tons more  IRS-like formulas, stipulations and total control over every aspect of employee, employer, health insurance handling s?    Do we want to add a gazillion new regulations, regulators, and endless bureaucracies?  This will be the end of American liberty as we know it.
Ed Morrissey   HOT AIR.com    March 21, 2010

"The only way to fix that problem in the ObamaCare approach would be to raise reimbursement rates to entice more providers into the system. That, however, would make it even more costly for both the federal government and the states. Obama and Pelosi hope to redistribute wealth through the exchanges so that younger, more affluent, and healthier Americans get stuck with expensive plans they don’t need in order to shift those funds back around to cover the Medicare expansion. This is why the individual mandate is critical to ObamaCare — and why a court decision against it would effectively cripple it.
The only way to fix that problem in the ObamaCare approach would be to raise reimbursement rates to entice more providers into the system. That, however, would make it even more costly for both the federal government and the states. Obama and Pelosi hope to redistribute wealth through the exchanges so that younger, more affluent, and healthier Americans get stuck with expensive plans they don’t need in order to shift those funds back around to cover the Medicare expansion. This is why the individual mandate is critical to ObamaCare — and why a court decision against it would effectively cripple it."

Hope and Chains